Panhandling: A Fat Beggar’s Perspective

The local TV news featured a story on Lubbock’s panhandling last week, and if true, accurate, and representative of panhandling in general, it was a revealing story.

Panhandling, in Lubbock becomes illegal when the beggar steps off the curb into the street to accept the alms from passing motorists.  That is my understanding of the comments made.  However, as long as the bum remains on the sidewalk, this activity is still within legal limits.

Of course this doesn’t mean it is “okay” with law enforcement or the community at all.  And I was amazed that the reporter generating this story found at least one beggar to confess on camera that he usually takes in about $200 a day from panhandling.

Wow!  I had heard such figures rumored before, but this would seem to be a “credible source”.

I sense that the revelation of that dollar figure on the TV news causes people to chafe.  It is the sense I get.  Perhaps I am wrong about that.  Perhaps, despite my best sense of it all, this very conservative, deeply Republican-voting community looks at that and thinks: “You go man!  Make that money!  Tax free too!”

But I bet not.

In fact the general tone of the report, along with the scrutiny by Lubbock’s police which also featured in the segment, suggests to me that this insight into panhandling drives a negative response.  Especially, as the reporter revealed that most of Lubbock’s panhandlers use the alms they receive to support their drug habits.  And this is likely accurate.  If a homeless person is making anywhere near $200 a day and applying even half of that toward their living expenses with any measure of financial discipline, then they have no reason to be homeless!

Thus, the view of panhandling revealed in the report seems to confirm public suspicions and put it all in an even more negative light than it already was.  And when the police officer directs the public through the media to NOT give alms to panhandlers, I see the powers-that-be in Lubbock coordinate together against the beggars.  Though none of the local charities were interviewed for the particular segment I am referring to (which was a surprise to me), the report listed most of them off and rolled stock footage of them.  This, as it was suggested that these people need to utilize these services rather than beg for alms on the side of the road.

The report (and certainly the officer interviewed) state that safety is the primary concern.  But in my opinion, all the talk of money made and what it is spent on suggests other priorities.

Let’s face it.  Begging is an ugly business.

Yes, I said UGLY.

It is humiliating to ask for money from strangers on the side of the road.  Money for nothing, no less!  And, of course, the bums doing this begging tend to LOOK THE PART.  In fact, the humble appearance largely drives the almsgiving.  If you stand there begging in a $500 suit and tie, people are likely to think you don’t need the alms you are begging for!  It just doesn’t make sense for roadside begging.  (However, it does make sense for too-big-to-fail government bailouts of banks and large corporations!)  Thus, in a proud town like Lubbock, the specter of such humility on major street corners does not create the image we are going for.

It is my personal thought that the UGLY sight of beggars is the real thing that drives this negativity and the subsequent revelation of the news segment complete with police scrutiny and suggestion that these bums be funneled into the community services while effectively shaming those who give alms to the beggars.  It is my opinion that we want to be a proud town, and this activity threatens that delicate image.

So, here is the Fat Beggar’s perspective:

The story revealed the limits of the law to completely stop this activity.  (Thus setting the stage for a proposal in changing laws in the future?)  Begging like this is legal up until the moment a bum steps off the curb, and the concern is for “safety”.  If you, the average Lubbock citizen, have chafed at the sight of this activity and wondered why the cops don’t crack down, now you know.  And if you ever suspected that these bums are actually making tons of money they don’t even need WHILE spending it on drugs in the process, then your suspicions are now confirmed.  Thus maybe, just maybe, you are now armed with the kind of information that can effectively change the situation.  You can contact a city council member, and pressure them for updates in the law.

You might feel justified now since it is clear that this activity is largely funding other illegal activities while Lubbock provides adequate services that any honest, decent people in need could/should access instead of begging on the corner!  And all of this hifalutin thinking has a way of justifying Lubbock’s desire to present a proud image instead of this roadside humiliation.

But what is the real difference between panhandling and selling Lubbock newspapers on the major intersections all over town on Sundays?  While not all of the people doing that job are homeless or addicted, a lot of them are!  And this activity is deemed appropriate even though there is precious little functional difference.  We have dozens, if not hundreds, of poor and homeless people selling papers to passing cars all over town every Sunday.  They step off the curb to make the transaction too, and it isn’t any less dangerous than the panhandlers.  And these paper sellers frequently generate much larger sums of money than the mere price of the paper!  Some of them are making $200 a day too, but only one day a week.

In fact, I can’t see where this activity is anymore attractive than the straight begging.  The little sign that says “News Paper $2.50” instead of “Homeless…  Anything helps” somehow conveys a sense of legitimacy.  Of okayness.  Of pride in actual work.  But that money is spent on drugs and booze too, AND many of the people providing this service are doing it for years on end!  It is not a rung up a corporate ladder – not really.  In fact, in my view, this is all a way of highly regulating the bums!  And conservatives typically complain about too many regulations.  But apparently only when they feel constrained by them and not when constraining the poor with them.

I only see a cosmetic difference there.  Selling papers is not actually significantly different from panhandling, except that it presents the image of control of the poor and humiliated.  It also looks like almsgiving, almost, but it also looks like work – earning the money rather than giving it freely.  That is where the difference is, and that is much easier to swallow.

On the other hand, giving alms is a time-honored tradition.  It’s been with us since the dawn of time, practically, and is authorized by Jesus.  I am pleased to hear that in Lubbock a person can make $200 a day just for the asking!  That is something to praise!  Not to shame!!!  The fact that much of that money gets used for drugs or other undesirable activities is neither the giver’s problem nor the exclusive domain of beggars.  Plenty of corporate executives use their bail out money, their corporate welfare, or even their hard earned money on cocaine, call girls, and other excesses that break the law, destroy souls, and scourge humanity ALL THE TIME.  Yet we continue to give our money to them every day!

As I see it, the only legitimate criticism against panhandling is MAYBE the idea that stepping off the curb is unsafe.  And thus it could be more appropriate to designate safe places for the activity instead rather than discourage it altogether.  And while I am grateful for the charities and community services Lubbock provides, this is a free country for the rest of us; why claim that for ourselves and deny it to the poor?

I ask Lubbock Christians to instead search your souls and humble yourselves before the Lord.  There is nothing wrong with almsgiving.  In fact, it is a directive straight from Jesus.  There is NOTHING wrong with presenting a humble image, not even as a town.  If our town is “Christian”, humility is our image, and we need not chafe at the sight of it on our street corners.  And if this is a “Christian” town, then actually the cops are presuming too much authority when discouraging almsgiving to panhandlers since Jesus, our LORD, authorizes it.



  1. Michael Wilson · February 19

    In Dallas, they tried to outlaw panhandling altogether. The police go back and forth on whether to enforce it or not.

    I used to get angry at the homeless who panhandled. Then one day, Jesus literally told me to give them money. So I do. He said in the gospels as well. It isn’t my job to judge them (another command of Jesus).

    Thanks for the insight, as always. I read with great interest to see where you came down on this. Many homeless ministries don’t take such a view as you.

    Be blessed.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. T. F. Thompson · February 19

    I seriously doubt the $200 figure. I’ve heard some who say $60 and that probably is closer to normal. I’ve spent entire days and the night with some guys so I have an idea how much they generate and it varies with the time of year, weather and persistence of the beggar. Then again, I still see where schools, churches, politicians beg all the time. Personally, I get tired of it coming from THEM. Yet, if it happens to the motorist hugging their cellphone it’s: God—WE’VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING! Yeah, they have to hammer the problem before it gets out of control. Of course, we wouldn’t want the homeless to cash in on a capitalistic system: NO, we’ll leave that to those guys who REALLY deserve it: guys like Hollywood celebrities, NFL players and MLB—guys like that. Sure, look at all the contribute to society—aren’t we so much better off because they are here. Hold on. I hear a Bud commercial coming. Gee and everyone’s against poor bum drinking. I wonder where it comes from? Now back to the game.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: Brother can you spare a dime? Fat Beggars – Hard Times Ministries
  4. Stacey Lynn · February 19

    Excellent post, and I’m so glad somebody finally said what needed to be said. I have been saying this very same thing for several months now. So much complaining, so little love…

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Agent X · February 20

    This comment sent in by anonymous reader:

    When I’m directly approached I have in the past responsed in some replanned ways. I’ve offered to take folks to buy a fast-food meal, or I’ve sometimes given a prepared envelope containing a small cash amount often a dollar or less along with a fast food coupon and the address of a homeless shelter. I suggest being creative. I also in winter months sometimes have a prepared bag containing a pair of new athletic socks, a new sock hat and a pair of cotton work gloves. When approached for gas money I offer to help fill a car tank with my credit card. I usually don’t carry even ten dollars cash and I’ve taken folks into a store to buy their needs with my credit card. Notice I don’t give much cash and I try to treat each as a human and I seek to meet a real need. I do think I will be lied to, but I take the request at face value.. and if my real effort to meet that need goes in a direction that doesn’t supply their hidden agenda… they break off and leave me. I will have invested some time…unless I give them my envelope gift, then the time went into preplanning preparation.
    With these efforts I generally feel I’ve tried to be God’s man in the moment toward my fellow human.
    Each needs to find their own creative ways to serve God and hurting humanity. These are some of mine.


  7. clashofcashntrash · February 20

    I don’t know anyone making $200 a day. I think it can happen, but I doubt it’s a daily thing. I bet 50 – 60 is more common. But it makes a difference when and where a guy panhandles. But I think Lubbock is a pretty good town about giving. Some towns are tougher than others. But I have made more than $25 in a day before when I wasn’t even asking for it. If people think you are preaching or spreading Jesus love, they will pull over to shove money in your pocket. I have seen it happen. And usually, it’s not the Cadillacs and Lexus that stop to do it either. It’s poor people in old jalopies and worn out pickups. They are the ones who praise God with their piddly offerings. Their last two mites, and those mites go to itching for Jesus, I guess.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s